1. Overview

The project is driven by the need to increase gas usage in the national energy mix while supporting Indonesia’s net-zero emissions target by 2050. The scope covers the installation of a subsea manifold structure and four flexible pipelines to facilitate gas transportation from offshore wells.

Key constraints:

• Budget: $75 million
• Timeline: 4 years
• Exclusions: Deployment of Floating Production Storage Offloading (FPSO) and well-related works.

2. Project Management Components

The report follows a structured approach using PMBOK® guidelines, covering key areas of project management.

2.1 Work Breakdown Structure (WBS)

The project is divided into nine major phases, with detailed work packages for:

• Project Management (planning, audits, risk management)
• Site Planning & Contracting (environmental approvals, procurement)
• Design & Development (structural and installation analysis)
• Production & Assembly (subsea manifold and pipeline manufacturing)
• Logistics, Installation & Testing (transportation, installation, and quality checks)
• Project Closeout (handover and maintenance training)

2.2 Time and Cost Estimates

The project follows a bottom-up estimating method, categorizing expenses into:

• Labor Cost: AUD 4.2M
• Material & Equipment: AUD 49.1M
• Overhead & Contingency Budget: AUD 7.5M
• Total Budget: AUD 75M
• Project Duration: 3 years, 11 months (1022 working days)

2.3 Project Schedule & Network Diagram

• A Gantt Chart outlines key milestones.
• A Network Diagram highlights dependencies and critical tasks.

---

3. Stakeholder Management & Communications

The report effectively identifies and engages stakeholders using PMBOK® frameworks:

• Key Stakeholders: ENI (sponsor), Pertamina (client), contractors, Indonesian authorities, and local communities.
• Engagement Plan: Categorizes stakeholders based on power and interest, ensuring clear communication through meetings, emails, and online collaboration tools.
• Decision Matrix: Uses a structured approach to assess stakeholder influence.

---

4. Risk Management Approach

The project includes a comprehensive Risk Management Plan, classifying risks into:

• Technical Risks: Quality issues in pipeline construction, lack of skilled technicians.
• External Risks: Supply chain disruptions, regulatory approvals, workforce health concerns.
• Organizational Risks: Budget overruns, reduced investor support.
• Project Management Risks: Communication failures, offshore installation challenges.

Mitigation Strategies:

• Contingency Planning: Allocating backup funds and schedule flexibility.
• Response Controls: Weekly risk reviews, tracking risk registers.
• Severity Matrix: Assessing risk impact and likelihood.

Conclusion

This project management report effectively demonstrates best practices in planning, scheduling, risk management, and stakeholder engagement for an offshore energy development project. Strengthening resource backup plans and regulatory risk measures would further improve the project’s robustness.